Proxmox performance reddit. At least in small scale.

Proxmox performance reddit update the OS, firmware, etc) without incurring downtime of the VMs (as long as your other hosts have enough CPU/RAM/storage to go around of course). It does not have feature parity with VMware. VirtlO SCSI disk controller. Then When the Linux VM starts it takes over the monitor and continues to show the linux desktop. And two other small LXC doing almost nothing. Nobrainer (Performance issues) What you can do from the GUI is limited in proxmox. Thanks for any input. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. But I guess the same holds true for trying to run VM's in TrueNAS for example. Nov 20, 2020 · Proxmox VE reduced latency by more than 30% while simultaneously delivering higher IOPS, besting VMware in 56 of 57 tests. There's no harm in having proxmox with a Linux VM running your docker stack. I've seen comparable performance out of the VMs running on Proxmox vs ESXi (all figures +/- 2%, mostly +. Used to use proxmox at home but I use VMware at the office so thought meh why not. or from an android phone with the proxmox app. Even if that's the only thing you do with it for now the second you decide you want more VMs it's ready to go. 3GB/s for VMware ESXi. Proxmox VE: Performance of KVM vs. You have to manage zfs raid via proxmox itself. The sad reality is that cluster storage performance is worse than a single drives performance. I use ESXi Exactly this, done multiple times with proxmox and pfsense. Proxmox 6. com Mar 30, 2022 · When compared to other VM solutions that run on top of another existing OS, Proxmox is certainly unbeatable in terms of performance. 10GB are dedicated to the OPNsense VM. If you start with proxmox you will save yourself the headache of having to migrate to proxmox if and when you decide to. More threads really means more VMs at a time. It's handled at kernel level. Debian 12 seems to be running quite poorly, given 7. With modern ssd based storage systems this would be considered terrible performance. I have a 400/50Mbit/s connection and it's fine. I installed XCP-NG and then created an Ubuntu VM running plex with 2 cores and 4GB RAM. Then I decided to ditch the Barracuda drive and buy an Ironwolf one, moved all my VMs to it (local-proxmox ZFS) and the performance was even worst (as expected vs SSD), this time I lost all kind of connectivity to everywhere (while moving/copying a big file) except PVE which seems to work just fine Hmm using bridged nics from proxmox to pfsense never gave nothing but trouble even with hardware checksun offload disabled , which btw puts a lot of load on cpu usage so if your proxmox specs or vm are not good that could explain the performance fluctuations. If you want high performance and high availability, look into zfs replication, although zfs has its own problems with providing block storage. 0 was giving me a python score of 3. Server load on the Proxmox host is typically around 0. 11 and 5. 1 if I'm not completely mistaken. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. At least in small scale. You may need to change network settings on those bridges to allow for faster throughput. No matter what I try, running the benchmarks I see latency and speed sparks in my benchmark. It didn't force a file structure like Proxmox and XCP-NG. You are using SAS drives and 10GBE. ZFS pool on the Proxmox host, fio commands run directly on the Proxmox host (reference benchmark) ZFS pool on the Proxmox host, fio commands run in an LXC container in which the pool was made available through a bind mount ZFS pool on the Proxmox host, fio commands run in a VM in which the pool was made available through virtiofs Considering ECC ram tends to be slower than traditional ram, how much of a noticeable performance hit could one expect to see going with ECC ram on ryzen for a proxmox server as opposed to using non ECC faster ram? Proxmox would run VMs and services such as Truenas, windows VMs, encoding workloads, etc. then go back to grub bootloader and remove the SMBus from the vm so it doesnt break proxmox anymore. 2. 21 votes, 22 comments. This situation won't get any better on proxmox. I recommend upgrading to kernel 5. for example right now my limitation is having corsair vengence pro ram rgb not being easily configurable, i gotta passthrough the SMBus to the windows vm but that breaks proxmox so i can change the colors of the rgb on the ram. 1 kernel). Creating an lxc unprivileged vs privileged makes no difference to fio tests. Proxmox>OS>Docker>HA. Using Debian and containers or Proxmox with containers/LXC would probably be more or less similar performance wise (as Proxmox is based on Debian), but you sure do get the nifty stuff with easy management, the option of easily creating a cluster for failover/replication as well as a GUI that facilitates these features without deep knowledge. 1 runs on 5. My advices is use pci pass through for proxmox Nics. Remember that HDDs are overall much slower than ssds, especially latency wise, which has a big impact on how sluggish something will feel. This is now reflected in the renaming from pve-kernel and pve-headers to proxmox-kernel and proxmox-headers respectively in all relevant packages. thats every time But AFAIK, a Proxmox cluster is more than just cold failover. I could run 2 or 3 VM's on it comfortably. The performance of the volumes are very good, but using LXC somehow have a bottleneck I guess somewhere. Proxmox has kernel 5. Lol! Understatement! VMware after the takeover is a disaster. The performance can be a lot or a little depending on what you need, but everything will feel a little janky. I wouldn’t rate hyper-v over proxmox to be honest, I feel HA on proxmox is slightly better to get set up… just my opinion…. Others are looking at Proxmox, and some are waiting to see what happ What I found problematic though, with ceph+proxmox (not sure who is the culprit, my setup, proxmox or ceph - but I suspect proxmox) - is VM backups. 4 LTS) in 6. The proxmox team has nothing todo with that. If your staff are planning to manage a couple of hundred VMs, Proxmox is simple and implements essential features like snapshots, backup, vm migration, and high availability. Linux kernel 5. Proxmox GPU Passthrough "Works" but Performance is Bad. They're are made blazingly fast (100G VM take 2-3 minutes), but restore is painfully slow (same 100G VM with 50G of real data takes an hour to restore to ceph RBD). I've made one osd every node/nvme drive and put db on a lv made on the sata ssd. Is there anything I can tweak on the Proxmox configuration (for the host or the VM itself) that could help close the gap in CPU/memory performance between Proxmox and ESXi? Lastly, I just wanted to add that I'm no expert in Proxmox, ESXi or benchmarking for that matter. Initially I set 24 cores, as this is amount of cores in cpu (8 performance and 16 efficient), but actual amount of threads that 13900k has is 32 (as performance cores have hyperthreading). " Reply reply More replies The performance monitor will give some more insight, but it's also more annoying to use, so you may want to google about that. I am doing that with SPICE at the moment, to remote into Windows 10 and Ubuntu Desktop VMs, and the performance is just ok. Under the hood proxmox and unraid use the same technology, so performance should be same. The windows VM can be started from the web interface once the linux machine is started. And experience with enterprise hardware. I wanted my VMs to see each other but be hidden behind a NAT, so I created a VXLAN in the Proxmox cluster, gave it to all the VMs as a network device, and removed all other (connected to physical) network Proxmox is build on KVM which has better performance metrics than XEN. Thank you. Hello! I am thinking about getting a new computer for my PVE rig, and I recently discovered that newer desktop processors can have different kinds of cores (efficiency and performance). x Kernel and also the upgraded 6. ) However one hurdle I'm running into is VM network performance. 7u3 that I'm considering moving to Proxmox for evaluation or generally to play with. from the pve hypervisor directly i get nearly full 10G over the network. Hot swap drives and fans and PSUs. Proxmox. Using LXC with Debian 11 template docker and Imiich, takes about 25 minutes to load entire library and always get IO Delay between 5 to 35%. The H7x0 series, with BBU, have good performance and excellent Linux support. But it'll probably perform better than any cluster That’s not good. So I'm still figuring out proxmox and understand the platform really isn't made for a VM with a full blown desktop gui experience. so i’m converting our gaming pc/plex server to use proxmox and have a gaming vm on it, i don’t play much, mostly single player game’s except elite dangerous or war thunder, I am all for Proxmox, but I must say that I am tempted by unRaid for the builtin Docker management. then i updated it to 15. Some performance tuning on Proxmox side can be helpful (checking AIO-mode and IOThread). I'd like to generate some sort of power to performance ratio diagram, if you know what i mean ;-). On Proxmox, I noticed that you can, as you can add in all the cores for the VM. VMs and Containers are running from this SSD to, in LVM-Thin. 6 with minimal variations. Nothing super demanding, mainly Microsoft Office programs. Proxmox also will enable you to mount an NFS or SMB share from your NAS and schedule backups of VMs to it. Good working E and P core support is available since Kernel 6. Now, for almost a year the performance were good, no issues in Proxmox neither in the VMs that I created. The VM is really unresponsive whenever much IO activity is going on, and that IO takes much longer then it should. You should also be able to tell IO wait in the Proxmox web console, but it's probably better to use actual tools meant for telling you this information as it may not separate the disks. Proxmox VE beat VMware ESXi in 56 of 57 tests, delivering IOPS performance gains of nearly 50%. If anybody has any suggestions or questions about what I did, please let me Proxmox VE - Perfomance Benchmarking IDE vs SATA vs VirtIO vs VirtIO SCSI (Local-LVM, NFS, CIFS/SMB) with Windows 10 VM Hi, I had some perfomance issues with NFS, so I setup 5 VMs with Windows 10 and checked their read/write speed with CrystalDiskMark. . If you see this in the Proxmox or Plex forums, or another subreddit, my apologies. I've taken down one of my hosts and installed Proxmox directly to test performance side-by-side. Im running an Intel X520-DA2 in my Proxmox Host (HP Z840, dual CPU). I already had this problem at the beginning of my experience. What things look like: Proxmox does work as a hypervisor to QEMU, so just like the default machine changing in v8 for better performance and compatibility, one would expect Proxmox-QUMU defaults to be optimized for big. Either you bring up the raid hw and use an ext4 or something else , either you remove/disable the raid controller and totally give the raid management to proxmox itself I am running proxmox 8 on an i5 13400 + rtx 3090 passed through to a Windows 11 VM. Just tested my OPNsense on Proxmox and perf doesn't look so nice. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit Homelab: Very slow write performance on Ceph Atm i'm migrating to Ceph for storage purposes, 2 nodes right now and preparing a third one (and a fourth later) Proxmox has made big progress over the years. I pass the cpu as "host" to the Windows VM with all cores. It's just a mention that other tools exist to maybe obtain a better solution in the end. Proxmox VE reduced latency by more than 30% while simultaneously delivering higher IOPS, besting VMware in 56 of 57 tests. Currently running PiHole in a container, and Debian 12 as a VM. 8k in cinebench - very close to native windows. Proxmox is a possible alternative to VMware VSSP. If you would use a virtual NIC, then you'd still have the physical NIC speed limit, if the traffic leaves the Proxmox host. Even for transfers to my virtual truenas with PCI passthrough sas cards was 200-400MB/s faster running on proxmox compared to xcpng. This is in no way a critique to Proxmox, which I use daily at home with great pleasure. We all use WireGuard on our phones & I use it to RDP into my workstation from client sites. I turned that box into a file server because it is pretty weak. The title, may as well say, "VM on Proxmox - Network Performance", as there isn't anything here specific to TrueNAS. The services that run by default on a Proxmox install don't really consume much in the way of resources, it's a pretty trim system already. Ultimately I want to avoid some of ESXi's limitations, in particular (but not limited to) more in-depth monitoring of my individual spinning rust HDDs that are behind a HW RAID controller (I've already tested it and I can do that with Proxmox + smartctl). Get a network usb adapter and use it for proxmox management, install proxmox (cpu host, hard disk scsi single), enable iommu, install opnsense and set wan and lan on the 2x 2500gbe nics as pcie passtrough. I just wanted to make sure I'm not using some wrong The kernel shipped by Proxmox is shared for all products. 13 kernel on Proxmox has this issue. Hi, Thinking about building a unified system for my whole home, 4x GTX1080 Threadripper 3960x 128GB DDR4 ram But I'm wondering… There is a known issue with the Virtualization based security feature called "Core isolation" on Windows 11 on proxmox. Is there any way to improve SPICE performance? Or maybe use another tool that would yield better results? While im not dont have tried hyper-v as much, i cant say much, but for my home lab, proxmox has been great to use a nice user interface, fun to manage all my vms via a WebGUI pretty good performance on a mobile processor. 8. So after trying 32 cores in proxmox config I got 39. The fact that triggers me is that I don't know what is causing bottleneck now, and also that for all this time the server was doing really good. 5GB of memory, 50GB storage, and 4 cores. The whole server runs on ZFS. Does Proxmox have any option to choose between them for KVMs? Thank you! PS: Can anybody kindly send me a pic or a link to one? Thank you again. TL;DR: I work on a virtualized Win11 VM (on Proxmox VE) and on this I create a Debian-VM (on Virtualbox) and this Debian-VM has a really bad performance. performance: Esxi slightly power consumption: esxi consumes a bit less power disk usability: i think they are the similar at disk management interface but proxmox has zfs so faster updates: proxmox is free support: proxmox has a bigger and more active community Hi, I had some perfomance issues with NFS, so I setup 5 VMs with Windows 10 and checked their read/write speed with CrystalDiskMark. I'm copy-pasting in the hopes to catch the eye of someone new. Check and adjust your CPU governor in Proxmox also, but I think it defaults to performance. I am not sure what to do next. I'm confused as to why performance would be slow in those Desktop VM applications when enough resources are given to it. I had a Mac Mini I wasn't using so proxmox made a lot of sense to me. The question is valid. The Community is vivid and rather large, the wiki is extremely well maintained. Using iperf consistently have me 20-30% better performance. Yes virtualization adds overhead, and I know that. Both is not made for any Kind of performance. But recently, all the VMs started to have really slow write speeds. (No erasure coding for example) Proxmox is excellent as a client for a external ceph cluster, just don't try to skimp on hardware by having your nodes pull double duty as storage and hypervisor. 84. I think you want to disable the "use tablet as pointer" option in Proxmox. Dual port Intel i350 NIC, with PCI pass through. Here is the full story with all previous tries: We have a little problem here in the company Iam working for and Iam trying to solve it. With a 1Gbit connection even the J4125 didn't struggle and that was using OPNSense in Proxmox so one of the newer CPUs which are maybe 50% more powerful again will have no issue. As long as it does not leave the Proxmox host, assuming everything can handle it and is set up correctly. PVE 7. 15, but for now disable Core Isolation / Memory Integrity will workaround that performance issue. I am somewhat new to Proxmox and am having an issue with a Windows 11 VM with poor performance. specifically the 5. With NFS, that being the file system it does provide the file locking. Better numbers than this were achievable with spinning disks on a storage array/filer 10 years ago. You have PBS (Proxmox Backup Server), a blazing fast Backup solution that integrates nicely. And, in most service provider environments, that's not really needed. Disable hardware pffloading in opnsense. 1 available if you ask the commandline nicely via apt install. You wouldn't even really benefit from precaching and the other normal tricks for a linux workstation, because most of them help with either xorg-related stuff or user-level file access. The information I found suggested that Proxmox shouldn't slow down pass thought disks significantly. A place for all things related to the Rust programming language—an open-source systems language that emphasizes performance, reliability, and productivity. Proxmox is more powerful when it comes to more advanced vm features, like snapshots, clustering, etc. Nov 20, 2020 · Proxmox VE beat VMware ESXi in 56 of 57 tests, delivering IOPS performance gains of nearly 50%. You get redundant Ethernet and PSU links. although i do think that that linux kernel switch was also necessary. It was nice that I could mount any folder as an NFS share, and store my VMs wherever I want. It is a lot of layers and it can add many headaches especially setting it up. I for one used a 64GB SLC SSD + 3TB SATA combined with LVM caching for my datastore and it was plenty of performance for my workloads, while ZFS + 4GB ZIL & 60GB L2ARC on 64GB SLC SSD was way slower. The issue comes when i have to remote and also get the display. ~100-200mb/s is maximum. LXCs should be unprivileged and the host access should be done by UID/GUID mapping. 4 that should have the fix. XEN has something called paravirtualization which has a number of benefits of it's own. Performance: Total score 17255, GPU score 18788, CPU score 11802 If it's hardware RAID, turn off write cache on proxmox, as you cache twice. There are plenty of resources left on the machine and vm but in game it is constantly laggy and server tps with low. I have two server nodes (decommissioned Supermicro workstations) in a proxmox cluster. I do not use any CPU intensive plugins though just simple rules. In a nutshell, Proxmox simply is a suite of utilities and a web UI running on top of minimal Debian 11. LXC For several years now, we have been using Proxmox VE has part of our infrastructure and we wondered about the performance differences between KVM and LXC as virtualization technologies. I use VMware through my VMUG 365 evaluation license. ubuntu bare metal kernel 5. Hello Proxmox Community, I am running a single bare-metal proxmox 7. this has to be a settings issue. Also running Suricata, Sensei and Ntopng on OPNsense. First of all here is my setup: Server: AMD Epyc 7302P 2x SATA 2TB SSD 2x NVMe 4TB PM9A3 Server SSD 128GB RAM The VMs are located on the NVMe SSDs. My thought is if the e-cores are handled well, it'll be brilliant for a very power efficient but powerful server. It's not a laggy issue; just slow opening and working inside programs. I’m sure this is 100% opinion but, should I virtualize it with ProxMox or run it bare metal for the best performance? Current Internet: Fiber 1Gbps Up/Down About 5 users on average, streaming, 1 working. practicalzfs. You can live-migrate a VM in a Proxmox cluster. 1500 iops is pretty low. :) Everyone is leaving as the license costs jump. It's unnecessary and will increase latency, which will lead to sluggishness. My last system was Ubuntu>Docker>HA and I really enjoyed it. I'm thinking of building a new server, and the 12th gen Intels look pretty interesting due to both the performance and the e-cores. but which?^ Using Proxmox CLI utils I've made a pool: pveceph pool create mainpool --erasure-coding k=2,m=1 --pg_num 32. All internal traffic, inside the Proxmox host, is CPU limited. Slowdown typically comes from emulated devices like emulated graphics cards with no hardware acceleration, offering poor interactive performance for GUI guests. If the performance tax is normal, I can live with that. I tested all of the storage controller (IDE, SATA, VirtIO, VirtIO SCSI) on Local-LVM, NFS and CIFS/SMB. With the desktop build, you get a bit faster performance. Not a "single disk" config, but my guess is ZFS or LVM single-disk would be similar performance so why not go with LVM in case you can afford to at proxmox boot I will see on the Linux VM monitor, the post from proxmox until it finishes. The cluster seems to be working fine however the performance of it is disappointing. I do have some concerns regarding performance. At the same time FTP worked like a charm! I never had this issue with Proxmox 7. With iSCSI being block storage you still need a file system and in this case ProxMox uses ZFS to put a filesystem on that block storage and then ZFS provides the file locking. Proxmox has Kernel 6. 8GB/s for Proxmox versus 9. Your other point about file locking is also partially correct. Used wireshark on my Win11 PC while debugging and found that instead of getting replies only on the 10gbit LAN, i got some too from the regular LAN, destroying performance. As for windows, it would be best to use a version of windows with no bloat, like tinier11, to minimize the OS garbage that gets installed with it. 15. 10gb network performance of virtual Nas and firewall vms is faster on proxmox. i am running Proxmox on a small home server (Dell Optiplex 7050 Micro, i5-6500T, 16 GB RAM) for a while now. Secondary host was booted with mitigations=off as a troubleshooting step suggested from the Proxmox forums, no difference in performance. About half are going to the larger enterprise services like Nutanix and Scale. As the "server" was build from spare parts the hard-drive config is a little bit unusual: - Proxmox is installed on an 500 GB Crucial MX500 SATA SSD. 2 (single node) Network: Open vSwitch HW: HP ML350 G9, 2x E5-2667 v3 OPNsense VM: 4 CPU (host, 1 socket, 4 cores, NUMA=1) 4GB RAM VirtIO (queues=4) Single FW rule: VLAN 1111 <-> VLAN 2222 No IDS/IPS LXC: iperf client & server The startup disk can be put on a virtual SATA disk, while the VM store should be on either NAS, SAN or direct disk passthrough. Don't look for the combination of E and P cores with proxmox specifically. So far I was primarily comparing when the hard disk is mounted through VM and directly in the same system (under the Proxmox OS). How do i check this in proxmox? my vmbr1 is 10g only and over the network from within a vm i hardly get speeds over 1G. I've started using Proxmox recently, and I'm trying to solve my poor performance. LITTLE where applicable. The ESP32 series employs either a Tensilica Xtensa LX6, Xtensa LX7 or a RiscV processor, and both dual-core and single-core variations are available. See full list on techaddressed. These are used for managing native Linux capabilities like virtual networking and Kernel-based Virtual Machines (KVMs). 10GBE will be a bottleneck, better Go with 25 or even 100GBE. Firstly, the Specs: Aorus X9s CPU: I7 7820HK (4 cores, 8threads) GPU: GTX 1070 SLI Memory: 48 GB ram Ddr4 2400MHz HD: Western Digital Black NVME 500GB In this case, testing on the Proxmox host system comparing to a Debian VM within (bookwork, 6. It even has a proxmox plugin. Tried Proxmox with both the stock 5. So if you're going to use para then obviously XEN is the choice. Members Online What are you using for web server mostly? I just installed Proxmox on a Dell T620 with 6 15K SAS drives connected to a PERC card flashed to IT mode. What hardware specs produce this number? I know very little about CEPH and it's performance, I come from shared storage array background. Sep 30, 2024 · My best understanding in terms of performance and resources; LXC for everything, unless you are going to run a different OS (like windows). 11 optionally available (standard issue is 5. Is that effect performance too ? Those have actively developed solutions for the desktop and graphical input that blows away Proxmox and the other programs I mentioned for the desktop rendering. You can only use the card in one virtual machine at a time, generally speaking. And when compared to the dual-booting, bare-metal solution, there is no doubt that Proxmox makes the multi-OS experience much easier and flexible. This way there is virtually no difference between running ESXi on a real Mac or on Proxmox, halfway pretending to be a Mac. That's it. Unraid is more a energy saving optimized NAS with a little bit docker and vm support. I've tested 2 of my other servers with 4-6 drives in RAIDZ2 with Crystal Disk Mark and get 300-500MBps sequential read/write speeds. Why proxmox install both os+data on the same disk pool while most of best practice saying to create the pool into whole disks without partition. Standalone, with poor-mans HA (zfs-replication) or Hyperconverged with CEPH for really big Enterprise environments. But does Proxmox know how to handle these cores? I've got proxmox installed and a non gui vm running debian 12 for a minecraft server. The raid card will cache and proxmox will cache. XCP-NG vs PROXMOX Performance Question So I have a server running Xeon E3-1225 V3 with 32 GB RAM. This allows you to perform maintenance on an underlying host (i. Running Proxmox on a Dell Optiplex with core i5 6th gen CPU and 16GB RAM. Running iperf between the Proxmox host and my Truenas server (on the same switch with an X520-da1), Im getting 2gbps of bandwidth when my host is the server and a few hundered kbps when the host is the client. x or debian 11 so I believe there’s a regression somewhere. Its a proxmox / VM issue. e. The new proxmox-default-kernel and proxmox-default-headers meta-packages will depend on the currently recommended kernel-series. I have really bad disk performance - only running a single VM on a SSD with zfs filesystem. 13 introduced some pretty terrible changes to the scheduler. I get those performance: I'm specifically targeting the CPU performance, rather than the storage I/O. Peak gains in individual test cases with large queue depths and small I/O sizes exceed 70%. The whole point of the LOG is to get the absolute lowest latency possible for sync writes; trying to use the SSD for more things makes it increasingly likely that you'll introduce a performance bottleneck rather than a performance increase. Supposedly it will be fixed in 5. 10 and got the performance to match the WSL2 (best performance yet) of 2. VM CPU performance is usually only a few percent less than running on bare metal. Had the steepest learning curve, but honestly wasn't too bad. 2 server and I am running into performance issues which a can't get rid of. ESP32 is a series of low cost, low power system on a chip microcontrollers with integrated Wi-Fi and dual-mode Bluetooth. I just finished running 3DMark Timespy benchmark with both powersave and performance. Yes, this is a better option than using an H330, as I've commented elsewhere. The real trick is that to get that performance you need to give the whole video card to the VM, which means your host (Proxmox) only gets to use the iGPU. As i'm using consumer devices, the performance of a regular SATA SSD is suffient for my needs. Hints are welcome. com with the ZFS community as well. During installation it made very clear that my hardware was old and probably won't be supported in a future version. 5. Not great, not terrible. If this is a newer issue, there was a bug fixed in the Linux kernel recently that really screwed up VMs running a BSD variant’s performance. If the NIC isn't showing as available hardware on the VM, then you need to check on how you are exposing the adaptor to the VM. 13. I'm sure I have something setup wrong - new to Proxmox & ZFS. The attached image describes the network architecture. The host is on a Dell R630; dual E5-2697v3, 64gb of ram. I was watching a video of a guy who was demonstrating how to create a VM, and I noticed something right away : you can not use all the CPU cores for the VM. - 1* 256Gb sata ssd ( where proxmox is installed ) - 1 * 512Gb nvme ssd ( it's pcieX1 so max to ~ 900/1000 mb/s ) Every node is connected to two separate switch , then there is a bond interface that have both ethernet adapter ( balance-alb ). It improved performance a lot in my case. This seems like a big reduction in IO performance for a physical LVM partition. The OS is installed on mirrored SSDs connected to the motherboard sata ports. Hello folks, I have a single host running ESXi 6. There is an official Proxmox document about Ceph and Performance. Proxmox achieved 38% higher bandwidth than VMware ESXi during peak load conditions: 12. Can it do 10 gigabit or more? Then that's not a problem. omqnbo owmahf allt ryguze sohrk rpgvovtu tuybm ate wbddi eqzzl