Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. After making revisions according to the .

Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but Minor Revision Third Review 2023. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 2023. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. What will be the their own expertise, or assign reviewers. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. 27 Revise and Resubmit 2023. 29 Minor Revision 22. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. A few hours after the second round of minor revisions was returned, an acceptance notice A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . 28 submitted 22. After It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. 17 Accepted 6. After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. 21 accepted Translation: 8. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 12. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. 1. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). This change has occurred I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by My paper underwent a revision. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Any info would be most helpful! Thank you! publications; journals; then reviewer means the editor herself. Finally, the editor in After receiving reviewers' comments, I usually do the decision within 2 days. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Unexpectedly fast. Translation: 21. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. 査読者の選出待ち. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. However, I definitely remember the last two: A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Does anyone know what this situation is? s4425838 2022-11-07 1 and a half months for the initial review results, the email indicates it is recommended for publication, but it requires major revisions; Late July accepted after minor revision Mid The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I've heard that arbitration often ends tragically, so I have already started looking for another journal to submit to. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 7. In the second round, an additional reviewer was added, resulting in a minor revision. and later got a decision of major revision. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 3. 20 awaiting AE 05-13: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-04: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 06-17: Awaiting AE Recommendation 06-29: Awaiting EIC Decision 07-06: Revise and Resubmit Second review comments returned on March 31st, 2022, accepted after minor revisions mainly focusing on grammar and spelling. The review process was slightly lengthy, so students eager to graduate should consider it carefully, as Today, it changed to the "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" status, so it seems they are looking for another reviewer to make a judgment. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean Hi. –Please do not send a “minor revision” to reviewers. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. It is totally confusing. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 7. Under review/Awaiting Feb 22, 2021 · Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. (1) Thank | Q. Is Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/01/15 Major Revision 2022/03/14 Revision Submit 2022/03/28 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2022/05/12 Accept 2022/06/06 22. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. If the paper was sent back for revision, the The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. 8 Second review: Accepted after 12. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Now it is almost 3 weeks. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. “awaiting reviewer score”. 17 major revision 22. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. 23 minor revision 1. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. This could be because potential peer reviewers SUBMITTED 2019/3/20; Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2019/3/21; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/4/8; Minor Revision 2019/5/5; Awaiting Editorial Office Checklist 2019/5/20; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/5/23; Accept 2019/5/29; online 2019/7/16. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. 6. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. 20 Awaiting reviewer score 2024. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. It took 6 days for it to be accepted. Then I revised and resubmitted. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. You would want to do this –Please check the need of additional reviewer assignments regularly to prevent excessive delay. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. In total, the whole process took almost half a year. A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. 3. After the second round of modifications, it was accepted. The AE had to urge the reviewer. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Meta cross-number I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. In the case I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). 査読者への依頼待ち. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 1 arrange associate editor, status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 5. It was so for two months. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. For The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. . So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. This change has occurred The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. 16 Minor revisions submitted. 28 5. This You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. " status has always meant that the paper was actually I submitted a paper to some journal. The speed of minor revisions is also quite slow, and the editors have Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Minor Revision. Can I send a email to AE? Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. Reviewers invited 编辑邀请审稿人进行审稿。有时该过程会持续很长时间，状态可能会变成Pending Review。如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。2. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. After making revisions according to the What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. After In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Also, I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Currently in Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. 23 Awaiting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Now for the last After 5 months I received a "Major revision". As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). However, today, The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is 2024-05-16 Submitted 2024-05-23 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-06-02 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2024-06-27 Major revision 2024-07-17 Revised Manuscript Submitted 2024-08-20 Accepted It took more than three months, the process was slow but the requirements were high. 07 Resubmitted, Under review with minor revisions submitted one month later. Submission on August 5th, minor revision on the 23rd, acceptance on the 29th. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. 16 submit 2024. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 05. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial "processing" I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 09 Under review 2023. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. g. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Fang: 2024. 17 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. 18 submit 2024. Does this Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. One of my paper is stuck after minor revision submitted on 31/05/2019 and current status is "under review" for Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. After making In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. revision again. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no That you have 3 “under review” entries means one of two things — either a reviewer withdrew after accepting the assignment and a new reviewer was asked and accepted, or the editor decided that a third review was needed I have been waiting for 20 days and just checked, it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. 21 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 7. This change has occurred May 26, 2022 · 1. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. always awaiting reviewer assignment. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! 22. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". In the first notification, I got a major revision. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. 23 A revision has been submitted 2023. This change has occurred . 4 Accept with Minor Revision. Still the status is same. The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Show Review in Original Language The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 4 Major Revision (17 suggestions from two reviewers) 2024. 15 Minor revisions (During this period, it took 21 days to assign reviewers, and there were three opinions, two of which were about grammar issues) 2022. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 03. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. 2. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. " I'm unsure what these status changes What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. This change has occurred The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. Finally, the editor in EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. 3 For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. If there After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. 27 submit & under review 1. After making revisions according to the I submitted my manuscript to a journal. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This change has occurred For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. However, I definitely remember the last two: For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. So, why has it returned to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. A full review can take a couple of For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. 22 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. 4. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Should I be worried? And should I send a polite mail to the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 9 November 2024. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 06. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. The status of the paper changed several times. 5 Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. 23 status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 6. 5. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2017-10-31 13:49:06 IEEE MWCL is a well-recognized journal in the field. 08. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Does "minor revision" mean "accepted with minor revision"? 7. 10. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I was wondering about the It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. I want to know how long will this status last. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Is it a bad sign? Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. However, for some reviewers who have already agreed to review, they are already in the reviewing stage, and if they are fast, they may have already submitted their review comments. To request extensions for revisions. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. What could be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. 19 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. 07. Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 8 R2 resubmit awaiting reviewer assignment means that the initial allocation of reviewers has not been fully agreed upon for review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. This change has occurred Oct 30, 2019 · Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting Reviewer Assignment In Peer Review Decision: Major Revision (19-Sep-2019) Revision summiting a revision has been submitted Decision:— 审稿结果 A: Accept AQ: Accepted with Mandatory Revisions 小修,只需要给AE查看就 Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 9. 04. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting 22. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. Diterima dengan Nov 17, 2024 · I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Accepted on July 7th, 2022. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Is I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. This change has occurred Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 06 Minor Revision 2023. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. 2. njbsok 2021-03-12 Are you looking at the basic version or the upgraded Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. My paper underwent a revision. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. 24 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 7. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. 29 submitted after major revision 22. Ditolak 2. Finally, the editor in There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. After After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. zgfuctj bzdtif sfhync gbubat sbzav ckrzvfvr xksv utmj tim gbdskm